#ENNEAGRAM 7 DISINTEGRATION FULL#
I no longer do it automatically, but in full consciousness. Now that I’m well aware of it, I leave the choice to myself. So I let the person or the situation take the lead, I no longer offered any solution, I even pushed in the direction that seemed wrong to me. The strategy I adopted before becoming aware of it was always the same. Personally, doing type 3, when I find myself in a situation where I feel that I have tried everything, that I am discouraged, disillusioned so I change my strategy. We therefore need the 2 specific inner arrows, but as we need the other arrows. The enneagram is dynamic, and does not lock us into a box. The reasoning is also valid for the wings. This compulsion which remains the founding base of each enneatype. Is it not the quintessence sought in the enneagram to be able to develop by integrating the strengths and virtues of each of the 9 enneatypes? And conversely, don’t we sometimes have dysfunctional behaviors typical of each enneatype? However, these behaviors are not all compulsive. But this is valid for the other 8 lines other than our enneatype. Effectively we can move just as well on the line of integration or disintegration. Naranjo, Enneagram, character and neurosis), (Correct me if I’m wrong), Naranjo does not specify it.įor my part, conceptually I am not convinced by this new approach. I write “would” because if I refer to his first book published in 2012 (Cl. Namely that our type is simply the tension between our two wings. He would have the same consideration for the wings.
But rather that we move towards the two connection lines, all the time. By stating that he never meant to suggest that we move to one line positively and the other negatively. He would have corrected it in his first Enneagram Intensive at Bolder Colorado in 1996. Moreover, as Katherine Fauvre (US, 2019, Errors in the transmission of the enneagram, wing types, and lines of connection) points out, “ Naranjo declared in 1996 that he had been misquoted when teaching his Arrows hypothesis in an early SAT (Seekers After Truth) group in the 1970s”.
Thus a 3 can capture the strengths of a 9 or a 6 just as well as its weaknesses. Basically, you’re like, “OK, my usual strategies aren’t working, what else can I try?”īut today some schools (of thoughts) consider that we potentially move on the 2 arrows. When the adaptive strategies of our primary type are unable to handle the situation we find ourselves in, our subconscious mind naturally seeks other ways to protect us and meet our needs. More often, we move towards them with a limited level of awareness. However, we rarely head for either arrow consciously. When we integrate the resources provided by our type of integration, we gain a broader perspective, we can take on more challenges with ease, and we find ourselves staying calm under pressure. Originally, the arrow of integration represents the forces that we must develop in order to balance the limits of our main personality type. And that when we travel along the “wrong” arrow, we jeopardize our development. It has been suggested that when we move towards the “right” arrow, we become more developed humans. Or he could disintegrate into a 9, losing hope and becoming apathetic, passive-aggressive. Thus type 3 integrated into 6, becoming more loyal with others, also putting his efficiency at their service.
0 kommentar(er)
